[KLUG Advocacy] Torvalds and GPL3

[Adam Tauno Williams]

> advocacy at kalamazoolinux.org
> http://news.com.com/Torvalds+No+GPL+3+for+Linux/2100-7344_3-6031504.html??tag=st.txt.caro
> Another interesting round for the Linux vs GNU/FSF debate.

"I really want a license to do just two things: Make the code available
to others, and make sure that improvements stay that way. That's really
it. Nothing more, nothing less. Everything else is fluff."

Yep,  a license that does anything else is exceeding the definition of a
"license" and becoming a 'doctrine'.  Talking about DRM in a license is
just dumb.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/pipermail/advocacy/attachments/20060126/99a807f4/attachment.bin