[KLUG Members] SWAT?

[Adam Tauno Williams]

>>>Can you run swat from the samba machine?
>>>(http://localhost:901)?
>>From lynx i can get to 192.168.1.200 but not 192.168.1.200:901
>>>I believe that it is a known problem that is fixed in the
>>>current cvs code. The fix should be shipped with the next
>>>release.

Do you have a swat entry in /etc/services?

What does /etc/xinetd.d/swat look like?

service swat
{
	port	= 901
	socket_type	= stream
	wait 	= no
	only_from = 192.168.1.5
	user	= root
	server	= /usr/sbin/swat
	log_on_failure	+= USERID
	disable = no
}

What do you see from "netstat -ap | grep swat; netstat -ap | grep 901"?

>>I could be wrong but I thought I had this working previously.
>Same here John ... in fact I logged on to ask about this here 
>and on the SLUG list. Something is not right because it WAS 
>working a few days ago. I may have upgraded samba since then 
>(2.2.1a) but I am not certain. 2.2.1a is supposed to be a bug 
>fix. 

Samba 2.2.1a was released to support WinY2k/SP2 as Microsoft took the
liberty of changing some M$RPC calls with that service pack with made
WinY2k boxes fall of Samba driven networks.