[KLUG Members] Nautilus smb: - was Two questions.
Bruce Smith
members@kalamazoolinux.org
Sat, 15 Dec 2001 23:41:32 -0500
>>Nautilus/smb: works fine at home, one Win98 box & one Linux box.
>>I guess it's takes longer at work because I have more Winxx PC's
>>to browse in the workgroup (about 100)???
>
> If you're not using WINS, you _should_. Just out of sheer performance.
> 100 systems, all broadcasting? Bad things man, bad things! ;-P
100 is probably a high estimate without checking.
A more real number would probably be closer to 70.
In any case, we're getting enough Windows PC's to make
a WINS server worth while now.
>>I've been thinking of doing that. I need to compile a newer
>>version of Samba on HPUX.
>
> Don't they have a binary already at Samba.org?
I'll check there, and the HPUX porting center first.
>>Yes, all my HPUX boxes are running NIS.
>
> Good. So I take it all UNIX systems are NIS clients?
Almost all, except for a few Linux boxes where
I don't want anyone else logging in. :-)
I've got one NIS server and a couple dozen *nix clients.
<sidetrack>
I also have the home directories NFS mounted on all the
*nix boxes - AND the /var/mail directory NFS mounted on
all the _HPUX_ boxes (but not Linux). (refering to your
comments on your leap list) I know about the locking
problems that can cause on Linux, but it works great on
HPUX, and I've been running that way for over 15 years
without any problems! :-)
</sidetrack>
--------------------------------------------
Bruce Smith bruce@armintl.com
System Administrator / Network Administrator
Armstrong International, Inc.
Three Rivers, Michigan 49093 USA
http://www.armstrong-intl.com/
--------------------------------------------