[KLUG Members] chartermi cable
Bruce Smith
members@kalamazoolinux.org
Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:40:56 -0400
> >>So what is the advantage of dhcpcd over pump?
> >1) dhcpcd doesn't crash my laptop, pump does about half the time.
>
> Now that's a feature!
I have a very flaky PCMCIA NIC. I can also crash my system
if I start paying around with manual commands like ifconfig.
It also doesn't work with the new kernel PCMCIA support, I
had to compile the old pcmcia drivers.
I don't have these problems with other PCMCIA NIC's. I only
keep this flaky one because it's really fast (when it works :)
and it connects on a long TP cable I have that's over specs,
where other PCMCIA NIC's won't. And when using dhcpcd, the NIC
is usually not a problem.
> >2) Hostname changes as sent from DHCP server on dhcpcd, not pump.
> > (at least with the default Redhat parameters on each)
>
> This is for DNS update I presume? Does anyone use the DHCP-DNS update hook? I
> haven't since Samba does that too and we had Samba before we installed DHCP.
All I know is the hostname (as displayed by the console getty's)
change to the name dhcpd dishes out when using dhcpcd, and it
doesn't change when I use pump.
> >3) dhcpcd seems to work from DHCP servers where pump won't.
>
> Hmmmmm.
Sorry I can't be more specific, but I don't remember which
servers I had problems with.
--------------------------------------------
Bruce Smith bruce@armintl.com
System Administrator / Network Administrator
Armstrong International, Inc.
Three Rivers, Michigan 49093 USA
http://www.armstrong-intl.com/
--------------------------------------------