[KLUG Members] Re: My suggestion on organizing binary CDs for x86 chip-specific optimizations

Bryan J. Smith members@kalamazoolinux.org
17 Apr 2002 11:55:49 -0400


On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 11:56, Bruce Smith wrote:
> Good luck!  It would be nice if Redhat did that.
> If redhat comes out with more CD's for more CPU's, I'll download them,
> use them, sell them at KLUG and even keep a couple updated as BSware. 
> However anyone running a 386/486 is going to be out of luck for BSware
> CDs!  These days you can buy a P5/P6 system cheaper than the list price
> for the Redhat packaged box set!  :-)

But you'd still might want the "default" one for people that have both
Pentium and Athlon systems.  Either that, or if you're going to include
both CD #1s, how much additional effort is it to add a 3rd???

-- Bryan

-- 
If consumers are liable to "correctly" license someone's IP, why aren't
IP holders held liable when they unjustly force the same consumers to
license the same IP more than once?  "Piracy" is a double-edged sword.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bryan J. Smith, SmithConcepts, Inc            mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
Engineers and IT Professionals             http://www.SmithConcepts.com