[KLUG Members] I drank some Nightshade.....
Adam Williams
members@kalamazoolinux.org
21 Apr 2002 21:18:07 -0400
>>Hw can three different SCSI controllers not work on this board?
>IANAHG (I am not a hardware guy) BUT . . . .
Me neither, I hate hardware. Every major hardware project I'm involved
in ends up having some stupid problem like this. It should work...
BUT.... One of the reasons I really love non-Intel IBM hardware - It
just bloofy friggin' works - ALWAYS.
>(This has the credibility of the all posts on slashdot that start with
>"IANAL, but" - and then proceed to give legal advice)
>Meanwhile back at the ranch . . . BUT, I once had a similar problem -
>kinda. Well, it was a different RAID controller, and a different pair
>of motherboards, and a different CPU manufacturer (AMD), but I did have
>the same problem - kinda! :-)
>Back when I was building my workstation at home, I put a 3ware
>controller in a cheap motherboard and I kept getting errors. The errors
>were worse than yours. Linux appeared to work fine, but files kept
>getting corrupted without even a single error in any log file. I could
>run "rpm -V `rpm -qa`" multiple times and get different files reported
>corrupted every time!
Right, that is the most frustrating. The problem is a little different
every time.
>I tried flashing BIOS in the motherboard AND in the RAID controller.
>Plus a ton of research and other talking with 3ware tech support.
>I finally "solved" the problem by switching to a different, more
>expensive motherboard (ASUS), and everything works GREAT now. See:
> pc1h:/home/bruce$ uptime
> 8:19pm up 83 days, 21 min, 14 users, load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.00
I could buy that. But it has the problem with ***THREE*** completely
different SCSI controllers - including an Adaptec 2940, which must be
the worlds most common SCSI card.
>Some people speculated it was the BIOS manufacturer, others speculated
>it was an IRQ sharing problem. I may never know, but I don't really
>care because it's solved. The point is, it can happen.
Yep.
>See, wasn't this post useless?
Yep.
>Other than to make you feel better
>because misery loves company! :-)
Being stuck at 256Mb is misery! Especially then I open ldapv3.sxi!!!