[KLUG Members] No perl experts out there have worked with Tk?
Ralph M. Deal
members@kalamazoolinux.org
Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:37:51 -0400
Mike Slack wrote:
> I've never used Perl/Tk. I've never heard anyone say many good things
> about it.
That implies you've heard some negative comments, right?
> I have used Gtk-Perl, which works pretty nicely, though you need to be
> able to read the Gtk+ documentation (written in C), and translate into
> the appropriate calls in Perl. For Perl programmers, Gtk-Perl seems
> to have more of a future than Perl/Tk. For the unfamiliar, Gtk+ is
> the Gimp toolkit, which is quite popular for doing GUI C programming
> on Linux (including of course, the Gimp itself). There isn't really
> any active work on the Gtk+ for Windows.
perl/Tk seems to be alive in Windows but very much under development in
LINUX. That may be my problem.
> If you are interested in GUI/scripting in general, I think the best
> solution is wxPython, which is a combination of Python and wxWindows.
Interesting. I am interested in GUI/scripting in general and shall
check out wxPython, even though I've never used python.
> I've done a few significant projects with wxPython, with good success.
> Python is much easier to use than Perl (and no, I am not an anti-Perl
> bigot -- I actually like Perl a lot), especially for large projects,
> and wxWindows is a very nice (free) cross platform GUI toolkit, written
> in C++, with a Python binding. With wxPython, you can even create
> binaries for Linux and Windows from the same Python code, a very nice
> feature.
So my wife could use it her MS system, even at her office, even for/with
her teachers!
> It's also not too hard to port the Python code to C++ if
> you want to squeeze out the extra performance down the road. There
> is also a wxPerl project, though I don't think it has nearly the same
> benefits and support as wxPython.
Thanks for the warning. Ralph