[KLUG Members] Re: Transactional filesystems?

Bryan J. Smith members@kalamazoolinux.org
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:02:50 -0500 (EST)


Quoting Peter Buxton <peter@killdevil.org>:
> Not to give it to the opposition, and not that *nix doesn't have its
> own candidates, but NT/Samba oplocks. As I understand it, it is meant to
> be able to pass file changes back and forth between two users with the
> same file open.

Er, not the same.  SMB oplocks simply rely on the "client" to do the coherency.
As a result, the rate of corruptions are intolerable.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith, E.I. (BSECE)       Contact Info:  http://thebs.org
[ http://thebs.org/files/resume/BryanJonSmith_certifications.pdf ]
------------------------------------------------------------------
* A lecture on software piracy from Bill Gates is like a lecture *
* on adultry from the owner of a brothel of other people's wives *