[KLUG Members] Re: Quick samba q
Bryan J. Smith
members@kalamazoolinux.org
02 Feb 2002 09:51:23 -0500
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 19:04, Adam Bultman wrote:
> Upgraded to samba 2.2.2-10. Still the same issue, even with
> a new conf file. Added the interfaces command, still nothing.
> REmoved the interfaces command, still nothing. Same problems,
Just removing the line uses the defaults. If the default is "yes" then
you still have a problem. Try putting "bind interfaces only = no" and
see if it works (don't forget to restart Samba after you do). It could
be something with 100 different parameters.
Either way, I don't think its a big deal.
> and I think I'm going to give up with this one.
Well, it's your choice. Oplocks are just a performance consideration
(at the cost of data integrity). I usually turn them off on shares
where a lot of writing is occurring to Access databases, but its good
for read-only shares for executables and databases.
> Might be time for a reinstall anyway.
Re-installing Linux does NOT do a damn thing. It's not Windows.
Everything that has to do with Samba configuration is in that smb.conf
file. If you re-install nothing will change.
A better alternative would be to delete the smb.conf, and then pull up
SWAT which will write a brand new one, from the defaults.
-- Bryan
--
Bryan J. Smith, Engineer mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org
SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com
---------------------------------------------------------
1999 IRS Data: The top 1% of income earners pay over 36%
of the taxes, but have less than 20% of the total income.