[KLUG Members] Which Linux Firewall?
Adam Williams
members@kalamazoolinux.org
03 Jan 2002 16:57:49 -0500
>This is way to good of a machine for a firewall of a small network. Maybe to good is not
>the right statement but it is a little overkill. A 120Mhz machine is what I use to
I agree 100%. If you want "real" security you need a stand alone
firewall. Using such a powerful machine as a firewall on a small
network just doesn't make sense. Buy a $50 clunker.
>connect my internal lan to the internet with a cable modem. If you want simple, Bruce
>just did a demo on smoothewall which looked very capable to me. I really like the idea of
>an easily configured ipsec. If your looking for anything from simple to complex as you
>want to get with the most recent kernel capable of behaving as a stateful firewall, I'd
>suggest iptables from the 2.4 kernel series.
>http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/presentations/20010417/
I use floppyfw so the firewall doesn't need a harddisk, maximizing
availability. With a little extra ventilation you can disable the PS
fan as well, leaving you with no moving parts.