[KLUG Members] IPSEC operation Issues

Ryan Matteson members@kalamazoolinux.org
25 Sep 2002 12:26:01 -0400


--=-uU+ShG8HqEdj5QlzuRjG
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Has anyone experienced any problems when deploying IPSEC in
their production environments? We are debating using IPSEC
between a Solaris and HPUX system, as the necessary binaries
are provided with both. Several firewalls reside between the
hosts, but I am not aware of any NAT'ing going on. We would
like to use AH and ESP to encrypt the headers and payload. We
are also possibly debating using Checkpoint Firewall-1 to
provide this functionality. I believe this would be a much
more efficient means. Just curious what the gurus on the list
think.

Thanks,
Ryan

--=20
Ryan Matteson - UNIX Administrator
GPG ID: 782C2F4B Ryan Matteson (Matty) <matty91@bellsouth.net>
Fingerprint =3D C8D2 E7E8 815C 7AF6 59C4  C621 B829 A3D9 782C 2F4B

--=-uU+ShG8HqEdj5QlzuRjG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9keOZuCmj2XgsL0sRAqdDAJ9rHsRgNV/XESXe23f1zlVoQ7flUgCfdlUo
5S4kMOT9JPk++NbLRxvrSeA=
=69jl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-uU+ShG8HqEdj5QlzuRjG--