[KLUG Members] Nomination status.

Adam Williams members@kalamazoolinux.org
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:45:07 -0500


> >>>The status of current nominations are as follows:
> >>> Peter Buxton has accepted a nomination to run for Chairman.
> >>> John Bridleman as also accepted a nomination for Chairman!
> >>>It appears like we are going to have a real race for the first time!
> >>>Never before in the history of KLUG have multiple people run for the
> >>>same office.  Cool!  Let the mud slinging begin!  :-)
> >>This is very cool, and I like both candidates.  Perhaps they can provide
> >>us some synopsis of why we should choose one or the other?
> >Yes, I'm sure either candidate would make a very good chairman.
> Any candidates would do well to post a brief statement of their ideas
> regarding KLUG, and what they would expect to do during their tenure.

Including how they intent to go about filling the many volunteer
positions (their cabinet?).  Especially if I'd get reappointed as
Program Director,  thats a litmus-test issue for me. :)

> I would like to see these statements on our website as well, and not only
> in the list archives, but probably on the organize page.

Yes.

> >I was recently accused privately of being biased in my original email
> >because I added an explanation point at the end of John's line and not
> >Peter's.  That was NOT MY INTENT.  I was expressing my surprise and

Wow, I never thought I'd have to draw a comparison between FOX News and
Bruce Smith.  Such blatant bias... tsck tsck.

> >> John's plan to implant all KLUG members with RFID tags and sell their
> >> demographic information as a fund raiser vs. Buxton's plan to require an
> >> oath of allegience to Richard Stallman from all KLUG members, etc...
> >I've been putting RFID tags in the snacks for weeks now. ;-)
> One of the talents required of a good chairman is the ability to delegate; 
> I would encourage Mr. Bridleman that (if elected on this platform) he would
> do well to so modify the position description of the Nutrimaster so that
> this can be implemented cleanly.

See, this scandal is already getting one candidate free publicity.  Mr.
Buxton had better fess up to some past indescretions and steal the
attention of the paparatzi back to his campaign.