[KLUG Members] Squid "no_cache"

[Mike Morrett]

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:19:05 -0500, "Adam Tauno Williams"
<adam@morrison-ind.com> said:

---snip---

> >User3 is a part-time admin person I have manage my IPCop box (he/she has
> >the Admin password).
> >User3 is pissed at me for asking he/she too many damn questions!
> 
> If this actually happens then (a) the squid on the ipCop box is
> *S*C*R*E*W*E*D*.
>  We use webmail corporately, and no chance of accidentally calling up
>  someone
> else's mail, or (b) www.fastmail.fm is seriously flawed.

Sorry, guess I wasn't very clear... User3 connects to IPCop thru its
Admin Web interface, and will have access to ALL stuff in cache.  IPCop
has a nice GUI that you can double-click on stuff.  I'll bring a
print-screen to tonites meeting.

> I've never used the no cache directive, but if either of the above is
> true you
> could use it as a stop gap measure I suppose - until you fix the real
> problem.
> 
> >So, User3 logs into the IPCop box and proceeds to read User1's and
> >User2's secret Emails.
>  
> Should never happen, ever.

Sorry, guess I wasn't very clear... User3 connects to IPCop thru its
Admin Web interface, and will have access to ALL stuff in cache.  IPCop
has a nice GUI that you can double-click on stuff.  I'll bring a
print-screen to tonites meeting.

---snip---

> come on, just picture the three of them together wearing tights!).

Yuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Later,
Mike
--
No cream, no sugar, and death before decaf!