[KLUG Members] 2.4.22 On The Verge

[Adam Williams]

> > > > Known to currently not work
> > > > ---------------------------
> > > > * LVM
> > > Let us know what you find out about LVM in the 2.6 kernel(s).
> > Yep, LVM does NOT work with 2.6.0.  The on-disk format between LVM 1
& 2
> > is supposed to be compatible, but 2.6.0-test4 cannot locate the LVM
1
> > volumes.  Strange.  There must be some bit of glue missing.
> Did you get the RH RPM's running on something anyway (without LVM)?

I don't have anything that doesn't use LVM, except in VMware, and I
don't think VMware is self-hosting. :)

> If so, I'd be REALLY interested in hearing if VMware could compile
it's
> modules and run under 2.6.  Otherwise I won't even bother trying 2.6.

Hadn't thought about that.  Yea, if VMware doesn't work it is pretty
useless.