[KLUG Members] Dropping CIS enrollments

Adam Williams adam at morrison-ind.com
Sun Aug 22 10:53:47 EDT 2004


> I'll have to say I agree that college and certs are extremely different
> in objective.  Different employers have differing perspectives as well
> of the prospective employer possible qualifications.  Employers want
> risk reduction.  They want someone else to put a seal of
> adequacy/excellence on the future employee before they commit

Yep, having *something* is important.  What to have, and how much paper
you need depends alot on how much the HR department plays a role in
hiring  THe more central the role of HR the more paper you'll need;  the
more hiring is departmental the mor emeplhasis is likely to be placed on
'intangibles'.  So if you want to work for a BIG company (probably
centralized HR) that pays more (and lays you off after 12 months) - you're
going to need paper.  So I think it does depend on the students objective.
Personally I seem to see a strong inverse relationship in CIS between pay
and job stability;  best to find a comfortable spot in the middle at a
medium sized company (thats my advice anyway).

>.  I'd say
> the best thing is good references.  References the employer respects. 
> Those references are most often people they trust but can be certs and
> degrees.

YES
YES
YES

> I have a degree from WMU and feel that in no way shape or form did it
> cater to the least common denominator.  It was a serious challenge.  My
> degree was engineering and I will say that the material in the degree
> and the pre-requisite knowledge to perform the engineering job I did
> have for a few years were in different ballparks.  The material in
> college tends to be more general and theoretical.  Certs test knowledge
> in a field as currently practiced.  College tends to think a little more
> long term.  If a college taught to a cert, the material would probably
> be worthless by graduation.

I think that is all true,  but in my experience with graduates it isn't
true of CIS programs - they did teach like it was toward a certification,
only they did it badly.  So why not just get the certification.

Maybe WMU is a shining example of doing-it-right;  my experience is with
the GR colleges (GVSU, Davenport, GRCC, Calvin, Cornerstone, and a pinch
of Ferris).  [Note: I'm not surprised that certain of these schools suck,
but for other reasons]

> I still believe that a degree is just to show that you have learned how
> to learn in a related field and that the instructors have said so.

And that is not a bad thing - assuming the instructors are serious
devotees of their field(s).

> I look in the paper every week and the job situation in kazoo is not
> good lately (read last 3 years).  I know most jobs are not found through
> the paper but I think it is a indicator for the market.  Systems admins
> support users.  The number of users in Michigan I think is just going
> down the tubes.  Manufacturing jobs are flying to other locations.

True, but alot of other industries (like heath care) that are on the rise
use lots of IT.



More information about the Members mailing list