[KLUG Members] Help for upgrade to Samba 3.0.1 (LDAPSAM) fm 2.2.8a anybody?

[Jim C.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 

|
|Well, technically all uidNumbers must be unique, and all gidNumbers must
|be unique but uid space and gid space are seperate.  uid = 0 has a
|special meaning, everything else is just a number.  Personally it is

Includeing gid/gidNumber=0?  I note that the root group is also gid=0
and that all of roots files belong to this group.

|nice to have uid/gid space unified (no overlaps) but not really feasable
|given most installs.  I just make sure users and user groups (the ones
|you create, not that come with the system) don't overlap.


| gruesome way.)
|
|For example, we use -
|[root@littleboy /root]# net groupmap list
|Mail Managers (S-1-5-21-2037442776-3290224752-88127236-1507) -> mailmgmt
|...
|Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2037442776-3290224752-88127236-512) -> admins

Here is what I've got now:
[root@enigma root]# net3 groupmap list
Administrators (S-1-5-21-1825057718-3407101348-4194330872-544) -> root
Users (S-1-5-21-1825057718-3407101348-4194330872-545) -> dusers
Guests (S-1-5-21-1825057718-3407101348-4194330872-514) -> nogroup

Now I notice that despite the fact that there is no root group in my
LDAP db, it is dispalying as root.  The group is actually named admins.
Is this because admins is gidNumber=0 ?


|>I can make guesses but I

...

|>days ago so I'll try again this evening.
|
|
|The balance of the universe will be restored;  you'll come to hate
|Earthlink.

I never liked em to begin with. ;-)  I just needed a non-javahop
address to test to see if the mail problem was organizationally
related or whatnot.  My roomie has EL and mentioned that she could get
another address.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD4DBQFABsfh57L0B7uXm9oRApBjAKCHe8gT6KN2eYP9XPlLrRIELd3qDACYgIqX
WHYl0n0Z+SXd42wVk2ACWg==
=bXvw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----