[KLUG Members] no route to local network?

Adam Tauno Williams awilliam at whitemice.org
Sat May 7 09:26:37 EDT 2005


> >Where is a reference to eth1?  The first line looks like it might be the
> >route to the LAN, is the LAN hooked into eth0?  You're certain the your
> >firewall isn't blocking ICMP?
> That test was run with the rtl 8139 (which was going to be outside) 
> disabled, which is why there's no eth1 showing.  At the time I ran these 
> tests, the cable-modem hadn't arrived yet so eth1 couldn't get an IP 
> anyway.  I've also tried it with the firewall disabled in YAST, and 
> nothing changes.  

Have these NICs worked at some point since you put them in this machine?
Anything in dmesg when you try send pings?  What do the counters on the
interfaces look like (they go up?)?

> How would an IPtables problem produce "no route to 
> host" messages anyway?

Easy, by tossing ICMP traffic and SYN requests to /dev/null.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20050507/8d18dece/attachment.bin


More information about the Members mailing list