[KLUG Members] SquidGuard vs DansGuardian

[Jeremy Leonard]

Darrel Clute wrote:

>On Wednesday 25 May 2005 19:47, Komal wrote:
>  
>
>>In my experience, SquidGuard runs very stable in my environment
>>(around 2 years) and "integrated" to Squid, but it seems no more
>>development. I never use DanGuardian that claim better than
>>SquidGuard.
>>    
>>
>
>I have had limited experience with both products so I can't really 
>give a good review.  I will state that from that small experience I 
>have found DansGuardian to provide an overall better level of 
>filtering than SquidGuard, out of the box anyway.  Again I do have 
>limited experience with these products so probably will not be the 
>best proponent in your decision.
>  
>
I have used both for quite a while. SquidGuard is good for catagorized 
sites. Dan's Guardian does actual content filtering. I get many more 
false positives with DG and I do with SG. Also you can use DMOZ 
catagories with SG which are more complete that the SG lists.

Hope this helps.

Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20050526/8c79f196/attachment.html