[KLUG Advocacy] Re: Let's get this CS v. CIS v. moron v. other party started -- The IT world needs to use lab-based testing ...
Bryan J. Smith
advocacy@kalamazoolinux.org
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:07:35 -0500 (EST)
Quoting "Robert G. Brown" <bob@acm.org>:
> I have similar experience. People with strong grounding in theory and
> few hangups about learning the next language, tool, etc. are going to
> come out ahead.
100% agree.
> Overall, what you're recting to is, in general, a lack of practical
> experience in "real world" development environments. The notion of
> rolling back a change, or seeing how things progress from version to
> version is easily lost on people who haven't been there. I recall when
> I was required to use version control tools; it was quite an
> eye-opener!
100% agree.
Although when I talk about simply using RCS to just revision configuration files
in /etc, sysadmins either say, "that's a developers tool and useless for me" or
the one that's that don't know what RCS is say "that's stupid."
Version control is applicable almost _anywhere_!
[ Plus, I love it to catch someone changing something and not cop'ing out to it!
Until I show them what changed _verbatim_. It's also nice to have a record of
_all_ changes -- so when some Windows bigot says "it's the Linux DNS, it's been
changed" I can show them _every_ change I've ever made! ]
> Again, depends on how the curriculum is defined, and the quality of
> the instruction and related components.
As always.
The difference is that in the IT world, it can offer "laboratory-based
examination" which is far more "real world" than anything you can offer in the
theory-based examination world. So why do most "certifications" still use
multiple choice for examination???
Laziness!!!
Only Cisco, RedHat and a few others seem to agree.
> Yes, it is a good question, worhty of some "horses mouths" that are
> probably on this list.. Educators can help us by adressing these issues.
My wife has a lot of thoughts, she regularly bitches about educational
approaches. Although she has a MS in Reading Education and BS in Elementary.
But even there, it's _laziness_. E.g., Why aren't 9th graders who read on a 2nd
grade level interested in reading? Because all the 2nd grade level books are
written for 2nd graders! Boring!
> Yes, I don't think credentials matter here nearly as much as
> experience, hence my earlier crack about what TheBS holds.
I was just trying to make a point.
I don't hold my college degree over _any_ technician. _Unless_, of course, he
calls himself an "engineer." That's different.
> While I have more academic background than you, Adam, I have actually
> **NO** "formal" training in what may broadly be called "The computer
> industry", which does not seem to have stopped me from teaching,
> participating in (invitation-only) workshops and seminars, and
> getting papers published.
Ditto.
Unfortunately, after 4 months of unemployment, I finally swallowed my pride and
got some IT certs. 0 training, 100% self-study. And the "self-study" wasn't so
much technical, but how to "take the test" and "according to the test, this
comes first, or this is important" BS.
> Pity the system, becasue there are demands placed on it that are very
> hard to meet well, or consistantly. I'd like to see something from
> practitioners in THAT field, however.
Agreed.
--
Bryan J. Smith, E.I. (BSECE) Contact Info: http://thebs.org
[ http://thebs.org/files/resume/BryanJonSmith_certifications.pdf ]
------------------------------------------------------------------
* A lecture on software piracy from Bill Gates is like a lecture *
* on adultry from the owner of a brothel of other people's wives *