[KLUG Advocacy] Future Proofing
Adam Tauno Williams
adam at morrison-ind.com
Thu Feb 10 10:19:47 EST 2005
One solution vendor pitching to us is using the argument that going with
M$ based solution is "future proof" (I know, I almost giggled) because
the Microsoft platform isn't ever going to 'go away' [ Is the
implication that others are? ]. Apparently he/they see the
Win16->Win32, VB4->VB5->VB6, NT->2000->Longhorn, Win32->.NET as the
progression of one platform and not a company repeatedly screwing over
its developers. Fortunately for us even our suits know enough to roll
the eyes when slapped in the face by a term like 'future proof'.
Anyway I found this amusing video from Novell while trolling around for
'future proofing' stuff.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/pipermail/advocacy/attachments/20050210/79a5177c/attachment.bin
More information about the Advocacy