[KLUG Members] Samba

Jon Smitley members@kalamazoolinux.org
04 Dec 2002 21:11:37 -0500


OK.  I think I should probably fight my way through with the encrypted
passwords. And thank you for your responses to this issue. But just to
let you know a few of the things your saying are about 6 feet over my
head. So if you don't mind I'll ask a few questions to you about what
is/isn't happening.  I sent a copy of smb.conf to Stu earlier because he
helped (if not on his own) get Samba running at the last KLUG meeting,
so if he contacts me I'll let you know.

For your info I am using:
	RH 8.0
	Samba 2.2.7
	Webmin 1.030

I don't have a good grasp on all the command line skills, so I use a
GUI.

Basically, Win98 can see to the point that security sets in, whether it
at the user level or the share level.

At user level I get;
	 //Madness/IPC$
Password ______________

At share level I get;
	 //Madness/sharename
Password ___________________

And here I'm stuck.

Thanks for any help in advance.

On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 20:37, Adam Williams wrote:

> I believe you can use a non-encrypted password client against a server
> running encrypted passwords.  But the server either does encrypted
> passwords or not.  In my opinion it is just easier to do it one way from
> the beginning.
> 
> You can always use the "update encrypted = yes" and "encrypt passwords =
> no" directives to construct your SAM.  I don't know if this works with
> SAMs other than flat smbpasswd, i.e. it may not work if your using TDB
> or LDAP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members@kalamazoolinux.org
> 
-- 
Jon Smitley <lunitix@earthlink.net>