[KLUG Members] Networking - Linux - Win98 - Mac OSX
Greg Mason
members@kalamazoolinux.org
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:28:58 -0500
I've found that the windows networking connectivity of OS X works
better than windows' own networking does in simple peer-to-peer
situations.
I haven't had too many problems with the networking in OS X, really.
just my $0.02
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 08:31 AM, Richard Zimmerman wrote:
>> The windows file sharing sounds like a Samba server, but I'm already
>> running a Samba Server.
>
> Than you already have file sharing for Windows!
>
>> These would conflict, I think. Web sharing
>> sounds promising to work with both the other OS's, but I worry about
>> security.
>
> I have not used apache to any extent to be able to talk about
> securing it so
> I'll leave that the the masters. I'm running a read only ftp/http
> server
> anyhow.
>
>> SSH, probably the best bet, but on one hand I've never used
>> SSH, although I've seen it used at KLUG meetings, And on the other
>> hand,
>> I have no idea if Win 98 can use the SSH.
>
> Sure. You use the sshd daemon on the server and there are several
> ssh
> clients available for Windows. I (and many others) use the free ssh
> client
> named "Putty". Works great!
>
>> Any views or ideas are welcome and appreciated. Thanks
>> --
>> Jon Smitley <lunitix@earthlink.net>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members@kalamazoolinux.org
>