[KLUG Members] GJ followup (was Meeting Notes)

[John Bridleman]

* Robert G. Brown (bob@whizdomsoft.com) wrote:

I was going to let this go but since you asked a question at the bottom, I'll reply publicly. I'd hate for you to get the last word. 8-)

> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:47:49 -0500, John Bridleman <john@bridleman.org> wrote:
> 
> >Exactly. Those questions would remain unanswered anyway....
> Not at all. If the categories are contructed with any kind of continuity,
> running the category from top to bottom leads on the contestants, and it
> follows that more answers will get their questions.

*if*
 
> The fun of the game is in the playing, not in "The grand scheme". By the

Not really sure what that first sentence means. Guess I don't really care. Anyway, I had fun!

> >It's embarrassing how the others are envious of our board control. 8^)
> Yes, Look at the great score you got, no doubt eared from "board control".  
> How many bonus points did you get from that? 

I think the better question is how many points did we lose from that strategy? None! Besides, I'm pretty sure we came in second. 8-D

You can reply privately if you want to continue this banter!
--
John Bridleman / www.bridleman.org