[KLUG Members] GJ followup (was Meeting Notes)

[Robert G. Brown]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:58:05 -0500, John Bridleman <john@bridleman.org> wrote:

>* Robert G. Brown (bob@whizdomsoft.com) wrote:
>
>I was going to let this go but since you asked a question at the bottom, 
>I'll reply publicly. I'd hate for you to get the last word. 8-)
More bored control, John.

>> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:47:49 -0500, John Bridleman <john@bridleman.org> wrot
e:
>> >Exactly. Those questions would remain unanswered anyway....
>> Not at all. If the categories are constructed with any kind of continuity,
>> running the category from top to bottom leads on the contestants, and it
>> follows that more answers will get their questions.
>*if*
Yes, If. Mostly, it's "is".

>> The fun of the game is in the playing, not in "The grand scheme". By the
>Not really sure what that first sentence means. 
Ask.

>Guess I don't really care.
That's fine. Don't write, then.

Any way, I had fun!
I had more.

>>>It's embarrassing how the others are envious of our board control. 8^)
>> Yes, Look at the great score you got, no doubt eared from "board control".  
>> How many bonus points did you get from that? 
>I think the better question is how many points did we lose from that 
>strategy? None! Besides, I'm pretty sure we came in second. 8-D
You don't get it.. or maybe you do.. too well.

>You can reply privately if you want to continue this banter!
I won't, and I don't.
							Boo!
							---> RGB <---