[KLUG Members] Help for upgrade to Samba 3.0.1 (LDAPSAM) fm 2.2.8a anybody?

Jim C. members@kalamazoolinux.org
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 14:46:36 -0800


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Adam Williams wrote:

|> How important is it to have the group mappings?  I keep seeing
|> this line in the logs: Jan  5 18:34:59 enigma slapd[1271]:
|> conn=78 op=23 SRCH base="ou=Group,dc=j9starr,dc=net" scope=2
|> filter="(&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=4294967295))"
|>
|
| The word "essential" comes to mind.
|
|> ere is another interesting line I've just spotted: Jan  5
|> 18:34:59 enigma slapd[1272]: conn=80 op=1 SRCH
|> base="dc=j9starr,dc=net" scope=2
|> filter="(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=J9STARR))"
|> Jan  5 18:34:59 enigma slapd[1272]: <= equality_candidates db
|> open failed (sambaDomainName.dbb) I'm beginning to think that my
|> database needs more work after all.
|
|
| Do you have a sambaDomain object in the root of your DC?
|
| Like:
|
| dn: sambaDomainName=BACKBONE,o=Morrison Industries,c=US
| sambaDomainName: BACKBONE sambaSID:
| S-1-5-21-2037442776-3290224752-88127236 sambaAlgorithmicRidBase:
| 1000 objectClass: sambaDomain

<sigh> No.
Well I guess that cinches it then.  I need to find out what the new
database structure should be before continueing.
Anyplace where I can find this info in a readily understandable format?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQE//IxM57L0B7uXm9oRAnY0AJ9E5L2QUe8dHPAHzP2a4BfF00cywQCeNgoX
fT1BlOf7kPNQcYPmlEwT6NY=
=y132
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----